Wednesdays, 3:00 – 5:40 PM
Dr. Amy Voida
Office Hours: 2-3PM Wednesdays and By Appointment
This syllabus will function as a collaboratively constructed contract among all of the stakeholders in this course. It is a living document that will evolve through in-class discussion as the dynamic needs of the students and their research emerge. Students are responsible for being in class, taking ownership of this course and their learning, and noting all changes to the syllabus as it evolves. The instructor is responsible for being attuned and responsive to the academic needs of the students and to the dynamic and often unpredictable nature of the research process. This draft syllabus is a starting point for ongoing dialogue…
This course presents a broad overview of research philosophy, designs and methods. Its focus is on social science research methods, and the content is specifically tailored to reflect the rapidly emerging field of informatics. The course will include major methods that are at the core of contemporary approaches to research in informatics.
This is a project-based course in which students will learn core research competencies by designing, conducting, and writing up the results of their research. At the conclusion of the course, each student will be able to:
- Collaborate in the construction of new knowledge;
- Translate a topic of research into multiple empirical research questions reflecting different methodological perspectives;
- Articulate the strengths and weakness of different research methods in a given context;
- Conduct a robust literature review on a given research topic and identify gaps of knowledge in that literature;
- Design a cohesive research endeavor to answer a research question that has not yet been addressed sufficiently;
- Collect research data in a rigorous manner;
- Analyze research data in a rigorous manner;
- Identify the unique contributions of a research endeavor, specifying its intellectual merit and broader impact to society
- Discuss research-in-progress via textual, visual, and oral modalities;
- Address the ethical issues that accompany any research endeavor;
- Offer cogent and constructive critiques of others’ research; and
- Identify the faculty members and graduate students who can support their research area of interest.
(Due at the start of class unless otherwise noted)
Introduction to the course and the semester’s research topic
|22 Jan||Collaborative brainstorming on the research topic||
Flick Ch 1: “Why Social Research,” pp. 3-16
Flick Ch 2: “From Research Idea to Research Question,” pp. 18-28
Flick Ch 3: “Reading and Reviewing the Literature,” pp. 31-42
|Brainstorming cheat sheet with 3 research ideas|
One-on-one team meetings
Team covenant (hardcopy due at your team meeting)
Literature review v.1 & team self-assessment (hardcopy due at your meeting time)
|5 Feb — Class Cancelled Due to Weather|
Elevator pitch presentations
Flick Ch 4: “Planning Social Research,” pp. 45-58
Flick Ch 5: “Designing Social Research,” pp. 60-78
|Elevator pitch presentation & team assessment|
|19 Feb||Nuts and Bolts of the IRB Process, Guest Lecture by Casey Mumaw (IU Human Subjects Office)||IRB certification (CITI Training for Social/Behavioral Researcher) & COI statement due|
|26 Feb||Workshop on research design||
Flick Ch 6: “Deciding on Your Methods,” pp. 80-99
Flick Ch 7: “Gathering Data: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches,” pp. 103-130
Literature review v.2 & team self-assessment
One overarching research question and three sub-questions
Workshop on data collection
No readings… “Do Over” Week
|Completed “Guzdial Chart” & First draft of your data collection instrument (e.g., survey or interview protocol)|
|12 Mar||One-on-one team meetings||Flick Ch 9: “E-Research: Doing Social Research Online,” pp. 165-177
Flick Ch 10: “Integrated Social Research: Combining Different Research Approaches,” pp. 179-194
CITI Module on “Internet Research”
IRB application draft (Due in hardcopy at the time of your team meeting), including the following, at minimum: (1) consent form or study information sheet, (2) protocol narrative, (3) data collection instrument(s), and (4) recruiting script/ads
Quiz due (in hardcopy) at time of meeting
IRB application submitted ASAP following my signoff; team assessment will be due upon receipt of IRB approval
|19 Mar||No Class – Spring Break|
|26 Mar||Informatics research at IUPUI: faculty presentations||N/A|
Team meetings for data collection in the field and/or in the lab
|9 Apr||Midpoint presentations||N/A||
Midpoint presentation & team self assessment
|16 Apr||Workshop on data analysis I||Flick Ch 8: “Analyzing Quantitative and Qualitative Data,” pp. 132-163||TBD (Will be customized based on the research in the class)|
|23 Apr||Workshop on data analysis II||
Flick Ch 11: “What is Good Research? Evaluating Your Research Project,” pp. 200-213
Flick Ch 13: “Writing Research and Using Results,” pp. 229-242
|TBD (Will be customized based on the research in the class)|
|30 Apr||Final paper editing round robin||N/A||Full draft of paper|
7 May @ 3:30 PM:
9 May @ 9AM:
|TBD||A subset of final research papers, as curated by the instructor, may be submitted to an appropriate publication venue (e.g., CHI Works-in-Progress)|
The primary text for this course will be:
- Flick, U. (2011). Introducing research methodology: a beginner’s guide to doing a research project. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Supplementary readings will be provided by the instructor.
Assessment & Evaluation
|IRB Certification & COI Statement||5%|
|• Team Covenant||5%|
|• Literature Review v.1||5%|
|• Literature Review v.2||5%|
|• Elevator Pitch Presentation||5%|
|• IRB Application||5%|
|• Midpoint Presentation||5%|
|• Outside Editor Feedback||5%|
|• Final Paper||25%|
All grades will be recorded as individual grades. All reading quizzes and the IRB certification/COI statement must be completed independently. Each research deliverable will receive a team score; each individual’s grade will be computed as a modulation of the team score based on their percentage contribution as agreed upon by all team members (see the assignment section for more information). All students are assumed to have unique strengths, which will influence their contribution to each deliverable. If students elect to contribute more on some deliverables than others, the modulated grading will balance out in the end, reflecting each students’ overall engagement over the course of the entire research lifecycle.
Numerical grades will be converted to letter grades based on the following scale:
|A+ 97 – 100||B+ 87 – 89.99||C+ 77 – 79.99||D+ 67 – 69.99||F 0 – 59.99|
|A 93 – 96.99||B 83 – 86.99||C 73 – 76.99||D 63 – 66.99|
|A- 90 – 92.99||B- 80 – 82.99||C- 70 – 72.99||D- 60 – 62.99|
Incomplete grades will not be given to individuals in this course, as any successful research enterprise requires the commitment of all researchers.
If you experience a personal emergency during the semester, please obtain a letter from a doctor or other legitimate source of verification. Although much of the work in this course cannot be made up after the fact, we will work with your research team to re-balance contributions to the research deliverables and to provide any opportunities possible to help you succeed.
All assignments are due by the date and time posted. There is no “late policy” in this class; there are deadlines. If you want to earn credit for your work, you should plan on meeting these deadlines. You may earn partial credit on assignments by submitting whatever you have finished at the time of the deadline.
At the beginning of each class for which a reading was assigned, students will be given a quiz in order to assess their understanding of the material and their preparation for the week’s research activities. In advance of each of these classes, students may optionally prepare one sheet of paper (8 ½” x 11”) with notes to refer to during the quiz. In computing the final, aggregate quiz grade, each students’ lowest quiz score will be dropped.
IRB Certification & COI Statement
Ethics training is expected of anyone conducting research with human subjects—anyone involved in the design, conduct, or reporting of the research; and anyone having significant interaction with participants. Students must complete the CITI course entitled “Social/Behavioral Researcher” and fill out the brief Conflict of Interest (COI) statement online [OneStart>Services Tab (top)>Kauli Coeus Tab (left)>Grants Office General Resources Pane (bottom right)>Conflict of Interest]
In this course, you will conduct research in informatics. The class will collectively examine a research topic from multiple stakeholder and methodological vantage points. Students will work in small teams of no fewer than three students, tackling one aspect of the broader research topic. Final papers will be curated and outstanding research may be submitted to an appropriate publication venue.
There will be numerous research deliverables due throughout the course. More details about each deliverable will be provided as the course progresses. Note that for each graded deliverable (except for the covenant), each research team must also submit a corresponding team assessment. These team assessments must be signed by each team member and submitted on paper.
A complete list of campus policies governing IUPUI courses may be found online at: http://registrar.iupui.edu/course_policies.html. Selected policies are highlighted below.
Each student in this course is expected to adhere to the IU Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities and Conduct. Academic dishonesty is completely unacceptable and any persons involved in such conduct will be disciplined in accordance with university regulations and procedures.
I strive to design my courses in ways that accommodate students with a diversity of learning needs and styles. If you have needs that I haven’t anticipated, please register with Adaptive Educational Services and notify me during the first week of classes about any approved accommodations.
If you require accommodation for religious observances, please notify me by the end of the second week of the semester using the Request for Course Accommodation Due to Religious Observance Form.
It is expected that all students participate in all class discussions and conscientiously complete all required readings and deliverables. Because of the collaborative nature of the research enterprise, it is particularly essential that all students commit to and engage fully with the content and deliverables of this course. If a student is unable to attend, participate in, or complete an assignment on time, it is the student’s responsibility to inform the instructor and his or her teammates. If a student misses any of the following without contacting the instructor, the student may be administratively withdrawn from this course:
- If the student fails to complete two of the first three reading quizzes; or
- If the student fails to contribute to any of the research deliverables prior to February 9th without negotiating this zero contribution in advance with their team.
Administrative withdrawal may have academic, financial, and financial aid implications. Administrative withdrawal will take place after the full refund period, and a student who has been administratively withdrawn from a course is ineligible for a tuition refund. Contact the instructor with questions concerning administrative withdrawal.
This Introduction to Research in Informatics syllabus by Dr. Amy Voida is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
If you re-use and/or adapt this syllabus for use at your institution, in addition to providing attribution please consider dropping me an email and letting me know. This information is extraordinarily useful for tracking the broader impact of my curriculum development. Thanks!